Skip to main content

Gap Analysis

Methodology

  • Mapping of European Cross-border initiatives:
  • Desk research
    • Inventory of cross-border services offered in a country
    • Categorization of each service by criteria: type of end users; level of readiness of integration with European Cross-border initiatives; type of service (informational, technical); language options; availability (residents only, non-residents, both); stakeholders involved in the provision of service.
  • Validation  
    • Interviews with end-users
  • Synthesis and prioritization of gaps
    • Hierarchization of gaps 
    • Clustering of gaps
  • Second round of Validation
    • Technical workshop with key-stakeholders (researchers, professionals who work with European migration and cross-border services).
    • Analysis of session outcomes
    • Session conclusions
    • Mapping of the gaps
across-summary-map-landscape

Gap analysis of digital public cross-border services

The main gaps and challenges identified in the context of cross-border services revolve around the development of a user-friendly and comprehensive technical infrastructure. The primary gap is the lack of an effective technical infrastructure, which hinders the provision of user-friendly digital cross-border services. This gap is further divided into two aspects: the machine-to-machine gap and the machine-to-user gap. The machine-to-machine gap emphasizes the need for open and interoperable systems to enable data sharing and protect users' personal data. This includes addressing issues related to protocols, APIs, datasets, service naming, and central data exchange tools. The machine-to-user gap highlights the importance of placing users at the centre of service design, addressing their specific needs and ensuring inclusivity, especially for marginalized users who might be hindered in their use of the platform due to external factors. 

Cross-border services risk perpetuating and exacerbating inequalities, in part due to the complexity in accounting and designing for many diverse potential users. Certain gaps threaten to stop a cross-border moving process altogether, such as not having an anchor for verified identity or lacking the digital literacy or hardware needed to access digital services. Such gaps may particularly affect people who are in urgent need to cross a border, and can exclude them from taking necessary steps like opening bank accounts, finding housing, or accessing other cross-border services.  

Another key challenge is the issue of (de)centralization. Certain aspects of cross-border services are overly centralized, leading to disparities in service requirements across EU countries, causing confusion for citizens. There is a lack of a clear central checklist or workflow for moving across borders, leaving individuals uncertain about the steps they need to take. Authentication issues arise due to the absence of a single point of sign-on across different countries. Centrally held personal data, whether by private entities or governments, results in a loss of control over personal data and digital identity. The project also highlights concerns related to privacy, including data minimization, lack of transparency regarding data use, and forced consent, which all contribute to users' loss of control over their personal information. Moreover, the project underscores the challenges faced by individuals at the margins, who may encounter exclusion and increased points of exposure during the cross-border movement. Lastly, the usability and technical completeness of the existing infrastructure are identified as a significant challenge, including language and bureaucratic gaps and issues with system usability, which hinder the smooth process of moving across borders.

In summary, the main gaps and challenges in the ACROSS project involve the need for a robust and user-centric technical infrastructure, addressing (de)centralization, ensuring privacy and data control, and making cross-border services accessible to all, particularly those with unique circumstances.

Cross-border service gaps

  • Countries are unable to identify a solid basis of trust and mutual recognition.
  • There is a low-level of information sharing between EU member states.
  • Lack of interoperability of ICT solutions amongst different countries.
  • No temporary ID for non-EU residents, newcomers or refugees to access digital wallets.
  • Function creep is a serious issue facing cross-border services, because the types of credentials that are developed and used in a cross-border context are often highly personal or sensitive.
  • Certain services that have been digitised in one EU country may not yet have been digitised in another.
  • There is a lack of trust towards and between institutions in the public and private sector.
  • People do not have control over who has access to their personal data and there is a lack of transparency about their data processing.
  • There is uncertainty over how to accommodate non-EU systems (for credentials, identity management, data sharing, etc.) within a European Data Infastructure.
  • There is limited use of the eIDAS infrastructure, and no mature digital identity wallet in the market today.
  • Cross-border services are not perceived as safe (like other digital public services). The implementation of robust cybersecurity measures, including the use of encryption and secure authentication systems, is necessary to increase service uptake.
  • Undetermined impact of disruptive technologies for cross-border digital public services.
  • Lack of attention to everyday commuters who face issues by working and living in neighbor countries.
  • Low digital skills which make it difficult for many people to access cross-border services.
  • People do not know what their workflow is to move abroad (which steps they have to take, and in which order).
  • Many services are not available in languages other than the local language.
  • Lack of impact assessment of cross-border services.

Developed by:

Waag